A special guest post from Robin Mathews. Facts Maam, Just the Facts. | |||||||||||||||||
B.C. RCMP Sexual Harassment
and the BC Rail Scandal
The BC Rail Scandal is so
huge and so intricate that it reaches right into the present sexual harassment
claims against RCMP officers made by Catherine Galliford, Krista Carle, and
others.
Responding for the RCMP in a
news release - under the Orwellian title “RCMP Health and Wellness” - BC RCMP
Superintendent Kevin DeBruyckere states that the RCMP “encourages our members
to report incidents of harassment….”
Ms. Carle has reported
already that when she reported incidents of harassment the RCMP Management
tried to cover up the problems. Males in the Force have made similar kinds of
statement.
Attorney General Shirley Bond
is completely unruffled by the news.
Negotiations with the RCMP for a 20 year contract with B.C. will go on
as if nothing has happened, she has – in effect – said. Ms. Bond, I suggest, is aware that the
RCMP has so much on the Gordon Campbell Liberal Cabinet and its successors that
she dare not suggest there will be any hitch in completing the new contract.
I suggest the BC Rail Scandal
is governing the conditions under which the cabinet of British Columbia can
negotiate with the RCMP. But there
is more ….
Let us remember
Superintendent Kevin DeBruyckere.
He was a major investigator in the BC Rail Scandal leading to the
criminal charges against Basi, Virk, and Basi.
Defence counsel claimed that
he is the brother-in-law of Kelly Reichert, then executive director of the B.C.
Liberal Party. Defence counsel
went on to ask in very assertive tones if Kevin DeBruyckere was conveying
information about the investigation to Kelly Reichert who was discussing the
matters with Gordon Campbell, then premier of the province. Allegations were made in the media that
Defence counsel had documents to back their position, documents that were never
revealed because of the sudden shutting down of the trial.
Kevin DeBruyckere was – in
fact – front and centre in the hasty, messy, odious, shutting down of the trial
of Dave Basi, Bob Virk and Aneal Basi.
How?
Here is how I interpret major
events. When the accused chose to change from their election of trial by judge
alone to trial by judge and jury, they had to deal with the Special Prosecutor
(who was illegitimately appointed to the position by the Attorney General’s
ministry in which he had been for seven years partner and colleague of Attorney
General Geoff Plant, and eleven years partner and colleague of Deputy Attorney
General Alan Seckel).
The ‘dealing’ between the
accused and prosecution resulted in an ‘Agreement of Facts’ between them - not
a rare matter. Often, to
facilitate trial, accused and prosecution agree to a number of basic
facts.
This agreement of facts,
however – as I interpret it – contained an “agreement” by the accused and their
counsel that they would abandon certain inalienable rights the accused has to
defend against criminal allegations.
They, apparently, agreed they would not question things like the
investigation process, the involvement of certain high-ranking politicians –
things, apparently, of that kind.
When the trial began a
complete impasse occurred.
Everything stopped dead. It
did so because – as I interpret events - the accused refused to believe that
the agreement they had signed was one in which they gave away some of their
right to defend against charges.
But they had signed the agreed ‘Statement of Facts”. Their counsel had also signed the
Agreement.
Defence counsel was in a
terrible bind. They had signed,
and – unlike the Special Crown Prosecutor - they were legitimately in the
courtroom. They would stand by their signatures. But the accused refused to accept the interpretation of the
agreement of facts made by the Special Prosecutor.
The trial stopped. The accused were advised to seek
independent advice. They did so.
Some days passed. Then … the accused
decided to proceed with their counsel in place. But it appears that something had
happened in the minds of Defence counsel.
When the first Crown witness,
Martyn Brown, long-time chief of staff for Gordon Campbell, took the stand,
something happened – something dramatic.
Kevin McCullough, Defence
counsel, asked Martyn Brown what he knew about the relationship of Kevin
DeBruyckere and Kelly Reichert.
And – if I remember correctly – he asked … or he intimated that through
those two men information about the investigation was likely being reviewed by
Gordon Campbell. Gordon Campbell,
premier, was alleged by Defence counsel to be a principal in the corrupt
transfer of BC Rail to the CNR and, therefore, someone who should have known
nothing whatever about the investigation.
No sooner was the question to
Martyn Brown out of the mouth of Kevin McCullough than Special Crown Prosecutor
William Berardino leapt to his feet and objected strenuously to, as he saw it,
the breach of the Agreement.
High drama was playing out in
the courtroom! The judge on the
trial, Associate Chief Justice Anne MacKenzie, had refused to acknowledge that
William Berardino was illegitimately in the courtroom. She was permitting – I am convinced –
an illegitimate trial to proceed.
She was – some suggested – rushing the trial forward from pre-trial and
was attempting to keep it packaged in a very small scope that kept away from
major politicians and major private corporation wheelers-and-dealers.
The trial stopped again. Associate Chief Justice Anne MacKenzie
had to rule on the legitimacy of the questions asked Martyn Brown by Defence
counsel.
She, now, was in a bind, as I
see it. If she ruled that the
questions were not acceptable, she might be seen as denying the rights of the
accused to a fair trial – and that judgement might very well be made by a
higher court on appeal. She would
not look good. I believe no higher court could approve of accused people
signing away their right to a fair trial.
That would contradict the most fundamental principles of our legal
system.
If she ruled that the
questions were acceptable, the door would swing open to Crown witness after
witness being questioned about the corrupt structure and dealings to transfer
BC Rail to the CNR. The trial
would turn away from the three accused to their superiors in cabinet and in
private corporations, and it might reveal to British Columbians a pattern of
criminal behaviour at the highest levels in British Columbia.
Associate Chief Justice Anne
MacKenzie ruled that the questions asked by the Defence were acceptable … and
it could proceed.
Alarm bells must have rung in
cabinet and corner corporate offices all over B.C. The trial had to be stopped right away, I believe.
Negotiations with the accused and their lawyers went into full spate. Only one other witness was half-way
through being cross-examined by Defence counsel when the trial stopped. Shut down. Ended.
It was all over. The Special Crown Prosecutor who was
illegitimately appointed, and his assistants, would collect (from taxpayers)
their (something like) $12 million dollars. Defence counsel would be paid by the taxpayers their $6
million dollars. The accused would pay none of their costs of Defence.
According to the auditor general of B.C., the approval of payment of the bills
of the accused was nowhere minuted in cabinet proceedings – though cabinet
approved the extraordinary payment of Defence counsels’ $6 million bill.
What sparked that rush to
close up the trial? The questions
to Gordon Campbell’s chief of staff Martyn Brown about the relation and
dealings between RCMP officer Kevin DeBruyckere, executive director of the B.C.
Liberal Party Kelly Reichert, and Gordon Campbell, architect of the corrupt
transfer of BC Rail to the CNR.
There was Kevin DeBruyckere
smack in the middle of the matter that blew up the Basi, Virk, and Basi trial
and caused it to end ignominiously.
| |||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
Thursday, November 10, 2011
Gordon and Michael Campbell....Criminal Minds
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
5 comments:
The RCMP must go! Lying, murderous , sexist pigs! You know they have the "goods" on the liberals and are using it just like Hoover used to do. WE now live under a police state and corrupt government!
I have a female friend who was in the RCMP. Not only are they sexually harassed. They are also demeaned and belittled, by the male RCMP officers. She was never so glad in her life when her 20 years were up, and she could get out. The RCMP males are disgraceful in every aspect. They are corrupt, liars, thieves, cover up for each other and commit worse crimes, than the people they arrest. That the female RCMP officers are sexually harassed, is known far and wide all across this country. Denying this is pointless, it exists. The RCMP's image is in tatters as it is. The corrupt judicial system, also seeps their crimes under the carpet. Canadians don't even want them as, an icon for Canada. They have disgraced themselves? And so, have lost the goodwill of the people.
However, they are exactly right for Harper's police state. No morals, no ethics, suits Harper, he doesn't have any either. Made obvious by, appointing scum like G.Campbell as High Commissioner to England.
In England, there are two Lords from the House of Lords, doing time for a hell of a lot less than Harper and the Campbell/Clark Liberals have done.
Gordon Campbell and Michael Campbell have been the gag material for the BC citizen's for over a decade now. And so has the media. Michael Campbell was involved in, The Washington Marine Group. The ship building contract in BC, goes to SeaSpan, which is The WMG's new name.
Being Canadian, is certainly nothing to have pride in anymore, it's an embarrassment. Canada is vile with corruption because of Harper and, evil politicians like the, Campbell/Clark BC Liberals.
There is a recession on for the Canadian citizens, not for the governments. The billions of wasted and thieved tax dollars, is sickening.
To suggest that Gordon Campbell and many BC Liberals are guilty of "crimes against humanity" is not a stretch at all. All the money that has been taken from the public and given to the friends of the Liberals was being used for schools, hospitals, special needs etc. etc. Also guilty are the mainstream press that effectively hid the criminality of these people.
A simple example is the $180M per year bank tax that Carole Taylor removed, just before being appointed to the Board of the TD Bank. Of course mental cases like Michael Campbell and the Fraser Institute will tell us the reduced taxes create jobs, but I bet the banks did zero hiring associated with Ms Taylor's gift. This money would have reduced the misery of a lot of single moms or the mentally ill that are walking our streets, for example. These so called Liberal people have no heart or soul, they are sellouts to power and should be tarred and feathered.
Anonymous said...
"To suggest that Gordon Campbell and many BC Liberals are guilty of "crimes against humanity" is not a stretch at all. All the money that has been taken from the public and given to the friends of the Liberals was being used for schools, hospitals, special needs etc. etc"..../snip
But, but isn't it better for society that the friends of government can afford to have more homes, fancier cars and send their kids to ski in Switzerland? Why waste money on education, health care or helping those with special needs who most likely can't ski, or drive a Beamer anyway when the folks who MATTER still don't have enough homes, yachts or luxury cars and SUVs?
"mental cases like Michael Campbell and the Fraser Institute will tell us the reduced taxes create jobs, but I bet the banks did zero hiring associated with Ms Taylor's gift"
Create jobs? You're kidding except for some credit unions are disappearing jobs almost as fast as they are gambling and losing with OTHER PEOPLE's money - with no fear as one government or another will bail them out and cover their losses so they don't have to sell the yacht or the estate and ski chalet!
Poor folks don't need fancy cars or resort property, they wouldn't appreciate it, you know!
And tar and feathers is too kind for their sort, drawing and quartering is more appropriate!
Its crystal clear that the BC Liberals and the RCMP have a "you scratch my back, I'll scratch yours" arrangement. Thats why Gordon Campbell hastily issued an immediate statement backing up supporting the 4 RCMP officers that tasered Dzeckianski at the airport before any of the details were even available.
Post a Comment